Talk:Goniatite
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Goniatite article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Categories:
|
Goniatites are ammonoids, Nautilus are cephalopods - the similarities are only aesthetic ones.
I originally wrote this article in 1998 and published it on the Web....
It need links to other articles.
Dlloyd 09:58, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Portions of this text are :
"Copyright © 1995-1997 The Fossil Company Ltd. © 1997-1999 The British Fossil Company Inc. and licensed by the owner under the terms of the Wikipedia copyright." Please contact me if you need further clarification on this.
Dlloyd 00:34, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Merge duplicated articles Suggestion
[edit]Goniatites should be merged into Goniatite as duplicate topic. Nmclough (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose They are taxonomic topics on two very different levels of the Taxonomy. Goniatite is for the entire cephalopod order, while Goniatites is solely on one single genus.--Kevmin § 19:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Disambiguate For the layperson, they look like duplicate articles. Nmclough (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- There is no need to disambiguate, the opening sentences for each clearly identify the topics--Kevmin § 20:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- okay, point taken. Will remove in few days assuming nobody else chips in. Nmclough (talk) 21:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)